Hillscore

Tracked politicians

Hillscore follows every House member with ten or more disclosed stock purchases in five years, read from their own filings, plus the senators our data feed covers. It is a rule applied to everyone rather than a list anybody chose: not party, not seniority, and not how often a member trades.

Each page below shows that member's disclosed trades, priced against real market data, with their Composite score — the average return of every disclosed buy over the last five years. How coverage is chosen, or the best and worst stock traders in Congress for who comes out on top.

# Politician Party /
State
Composite 1 month 3 months 12 months vs sector
(3 months)
Unaligned
vs ETFs
Notable
vs ETFs
Cluster
vs ETFs
Trades
scored
Options
(not scored)
Evidence
1 Dwight Evans D / PA +83.4% +1.9% +8.9% +25.3% +0.6% +10.7% — -9.0% 16 — Moderate
2 Pete Sessions R / TX +69.6% +2.7% -4.7% +25.7% +1.0% +47.3% -44.6% -57.9% 20 — Moderate
3 Al Green D / TX +64.9% +2.4% +10.1% +40.9% -8.5% -3.0% — — 25 2 Moderate
4 William Keating D / MA +61.6% -0.6% +1.0% +23.8% +2.4% -2.6% — -26.8% 28 — Moderate
5 Michael Guest R / MS +59.7% +2.7% +1.5% +18.6% +2.2% -19.6% -13.5% -27.7% 40 — Moderate
6 Robert Latta R / OH +46.1% +3.9% +4.5% +3.3% +0.3% +2.6% — — 19 — Moderate
7 Kevin Hern R / OK +45.2% +0.4% +1.1% +7.6% -0.7% -11.3% -52.9% -42.3% 197 — Strong
8 Robert J. Wittman R / VA +44.8% -0.6% -4.5% +8.1% -0.6% +11.7% -20.5% -23.2% 37 — Moderate
9 Ed Case D / HI +42.6% +0.6% +5.9% +18.8% -1.2% — — — 10 — Limited
10 Debbie Wasserman Schultz D / FL +35.8% -0.4% +2.5% +40.4% -0.8% -84.1% — — 11 — Limited
11 Victoria Spartz R / IN +35.3% -1.7% +2.2% +11.7% +0.5% +41.7% — — 13 — Limited
12 Thomas Suozzi D / NY +33.0% -6.7% -11.8% -24.0% -7.1% -3.8% -6.6% -46.9% 25 — Moderate
13 Markwayne Mullin R / OK +31.5% +1.0% +5.1% +27.0% +1.5% +4.2% — -36.6% 255 — Strong
14 Sara Jacobs D / CA +29.7% +6.1% +4.2% -0.4% +3.6% +30.6% — — 74 — Strong
15 Tim Walberg R / MI +28.6% -4.3% -6.0% +30.0% -3.0% -0.8% — — 13 — Limited
16 Shelley Moore Capito R / WV +26.8% +2.8% +6.1% +25.9% +2.4% -2.1% -30.2% -46.5% 42 — Moderate
17 Thomas H. Kean, Jr. R / NJ +26.2% +1.1% +5.9% +18.1% +1.9% +16.8% +1.0% +42.3% 69 — Strong
18 Robert Bresnahan R / PA +25.8% +3.8% +9.3% +23.9% +1.1% +8.8% -2.3% -15.5% 236 2 Strong
19 Richard McCormick R / GA +25.2% +3.5% +6.8% +14.7% -0.4% -7.1% -28.2% -26.0% 61 — Strong
20 Lloyd Doggett D / TX +24.8% +0.1% +0.7% +6.4% -0.4% -14.8% — — 109 — Strong
21 Dan Goldman D / NY +23.8% -2.5% -0.3% +32.8% -2.7% -6.8% -69.0% -33.1% 236 — Strong
22 John James R / MI +23.1% +3.3% +12.4% +21.8% +1.1% -3.4% +28.4% -33.0% 124 — Strong
23 James Comer R / KY +22.9% +4.2% -11.3% +23.1% -2.8% -2.0% — — 24 — Moderate
24 Jared Moskowitz D / FL +22.7% +1.3% +5.9% +17.2% -0.1% -0.9% -38.4% -28.6% 217 — Strong
25 Sheldon Whitehouse D / RI +21.0% -5.2% +0.4% +1.2% -3.7% +1.4% -28.7% -9.2% 24 — Moderate
26 Lois Frankel D / FL +19.9% +0.3% -0.0% +2.1% +1.5% +6.0% -13.4% +6.5% 134 — Strong
27 Dan Newhouse R / WA +19.7% +3.0% -1.1% +7.1% -2.3% -4.4% -60.4% -34.1% 101 — Strong
28 Greg Landsman D / OH +19.0% +1.9% +4.9% +24.3% +2.8% +40.2% +7.0% -4.0% 58 — Strong
29 John Boozman R / AR +17.8% +0.5% +9.4% +26.2% +3.5% -10.2% -0.0% — 83 — Strong
30 Alan Armstrong R / OK +15.8% +8.3% +15.9% — -0.7% -0.5% -11.3% -3.6% 341 — Strong
31 Jonathan L. Jackson D / IL +15.0% -0.6% +1.8% +15.9% +0.3% +12.7% -50.0% +13.4% 120 — Strong
32 Josh Gottheimer D / NJ +14.5% +1.5% +2.7% +16.7% -0.4% -6.4% -38.9% -30.4% 696 38 Strong
33 Cleo Fields D / LA +14.0% +2.0% +11.1% +25.1% +4.0% +4.7% -9.8% -23.4% 156 — Strong
34 Nancy Pelosi D / CA +13.3% -1.7% -7.6% -7.9% -1.5% -24.5% — — 28 26 Moderate
35 C. Franklin R / FL +13.1% +1.5% +5.5% +2.2% -2.0% -23.2% -34.3% +3.5% 68 — Strong
36 David J. Taylor R / OH +11.5% +1.6% +7.2% +11.1% +1.6% +22.6% +21.6% +21.7% 119 — Strong
37 Julia Letlow R / LA +10.6% +1.8% +1.5% +13.4% -2.0% +3.6% -12.4% -25.9% 141 — Strong
38 Tommy Tuberville R / AL +10.6% -0.7% +1.5% +8.9% -1.0% -29.8% -40.1% -52.4% 261 — Strong
39 Donald Beyer D / VA +10.5% -0.2% -2.9% -4.0% +1.4% -0.7% -35.1% -24.2% 17 — Moderate
40 Byron Donalds R / FL +10.0% -3.1% +3.3% +18.7% +0.4% +23.3% -47.9% -26.5% 44 — Moderate
41 Rick Larsen D / WA +8.2% +2.9% +1.0% +4.2% +0.7% -5.5% -10.4% -45.9% 37 — Moderate
42 Maria Elvira Salazar R / FL +7.9% +4.9% +10.6% +12.2% +2.4% -10.9% -10.6% -3.2% 77 — Strong
43 Val T. Hoyle D / OR +7.6% +3.0% +1.7% +8.6% -2.0% -17.6% +18.8% -13.5% 188 — Strong
44 Gary C. Peters D / MI +7.1% +2.5% +2.3% +0.7% +2.0% -8.1% -24.7% -18.2% 16 — Moderate
45 Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. D / CA +6.9% +1.3% +4.5% +12.9% +0.0% -13.3% -22.0% -41.3% 882 2 Strong
46 Carol Miller R / WV +6.2% -4.6% -7.3% -0.9% -8.5% -15.2% -41.9% -45.2% 19 — Moderate
47 Jefferson Shreve R / IN +5.8% +1.7% +4.4% +19.2% +0.4% -5.2% -28.8% -5.6% 200 — Strong
48 Lisa C. McClain R / MI +5.3% +1.0% +5.8% +30.6% -0.1% +48.0% -16.2% -14.1% 711 — Strong
49 Tim Moore R / NC +4.7% +3.2% +2.1% +32.0% +8.7% +31.5% — +26.3% 129 — Strong
50 Ritchie Torres D / NY +4.3% +1.8% +1.6% +0.7% -0.3% -11.1% -16.5% -18.2% 61 — Strong
51 Virginia Foxx R / NC +3.7% -2.9% -0.6% -6.3% -2.5% -26.6% -19.2% +5.2% 250 — Strong
52 Julie Johnson D / TX +3.4% -0.3% -0.1% +13.5% -2.4% +55.8% -21.3% -12.5% 111 — Strong
53 Rick W. Allen R / GA +2.7% -1.8% -0.1% -0.9% -1.1% -10.1% -40.4% -35.7% 28 — Moderate
54 Greg Stanton D / AZ +0.1% -1.2% +15.2% +74.0% +0.6% -0.1% +33.1% +33.0% 93 — Strong
55 Jerry Moran R / KS -2.1% +0.3% +2.2% -1.9% +2.7% +32.5% +9.2% -54.6% 15 — Moderate
56 Michael Rulli R / OH -2.7% -5.6% -2.9% +19.7% -7.4% -16.5% — — 16 — Moderate
57 Bruce Westerman R / AR -2.9% -2.3% -8.3% +48.5% +1.2% +9.3% +4.8% -3.5% 90 — Strong
58 April McClain Delaney D / MD -3.1% -1.6% -1.8% -6.2% -4.0% -15.2% -38.7% +15.0% 260 — Strong
59 Zoe Lofgren D / CA -3.8% -7.4% -4.7% -9.6% +1.3% -10.6% -78.5% +4.8% 11 — Limited
60 John J. McGuire III R / VA -9.3% -5.8% -6.5% -36.1% -17.3% -63.3% — — 13 — Limited

1 month, 3 months, 12 months: the average return of each member's buys at that point after purchase. A position sold between checkpoints (1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months) counts at each checkpoint it was still held for, then at its sale price in the first checkpoint after the sale, and in none after that. Hover over a figure to see how many buys it rests on. How these are measured. Trades scored: priced buys from the last five years, the ones every figure in this table is built from. Older trades still appear on each member's page. vs sector (3 months): what the stocks a member bought did over the 3 months after each purchase, minus their sector ETF over the same period — the same measure as the research, so it counts every buy whether or not it was later sold. Unaligned, Notable and Cluster vs ETFs: how each group of a member's trades has done over the last five years against the same money, on the same dates, held in each stock's sector ETF — time-weighted, and where the lines on the second chart of each member's page end today. Notable trades are in a sector one of the member's own committees oversees; Unaligned trades have no committee overlap. Cluster: A buy is marked Cluster when at least one other tracked member of Congress bought the same stock within 30 days of it, regardless of committee membership. These columns leave out mega-caps. How the tags work. A dash means the group has fewer than five positions. Shading marks a group more than 25 points ahead of (green) or behind (red) its ETFs; stronger shading, more than 40.

Tracked, not yet ranked

A member needs at least 10 priced trades before being ranked, so a score built on a handful of trades is never set against one built on hundreds. Members below that are listed with their current count. Where a member has none at all, it is usually a known gap in the source data, documented on the methodology page.

Data last updated .